Skip to main content Open Accessibility Menu Accessibility Menu

What are executive functions and how do they shape behaviour? 

By Katy Phillips, Linkworker / Assistant Psychologist at Brainkind 

 

What is happening to the world…

Some days it can feel like the world has turned upside down. Bad news, followed by more bad news, the media providing a steady stream of coverage of depressing, frightening, and alarming events. Much of this relates to human behaviour, what we do, and its results. We hear about conflict, humanitarian crises, crime, and overflowing prisons. Are humans’ behaviours deteriorating? Or are we just more aware of what is happening in the world than before? What drives our behaviours, how do behaviours ‘work’ at a brain level?  

What are executive functions?

Executive functions (EFs) refer to a group of higher-level cognitive skills that are essential for human behaviours such as pursuing goals and adapting to novel situations. These include abilities for our everyday survival, such as working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, planning, reasoning, and problem solving [1]. When these functions are impaired, people may struggle to manage their thoughts, emotions and behaviours, potentially resulting in behaviours considered challenging, out of line with social norms, or even criminal.  

Research has consistently shown that damage to the frontal lobes is associated with impairments in executive functions, indicating that EFs are primarily located in networks involving the frontal lobes and prefrontal cortex or key connections to these areas of the brain [2], which are large, late developing and particularly vulnerable to injuries to the head [3], also known as traumatic brain injuries (TBI), such as falls, car accidents, and assaults.  

For example, a study by Epstein and colleagues [4] of 55 patients with TBI found that damage to the frontal cortex disinhibited subcortical generators, which are neural pathways essential for functioning, including emotional processing, and that this, in turn, could lead to increased clinical symptoms such as aggression, anxiety, and depression. Although participants all had ‘mild’ traumatic brain injuries, the researchers concluded that the cumulative number of TBIs and whether these had led to loss of consciousness could influence symptoms long after injury, as participants had sustained their injuries nine years prior, on average. 

While some studies may have cast a degree of doubt with regards to the exact nature of the link between the frontal lobes and executive functions [5], the body of evidence, including some very interesting, high profile case reports [6, 7], indicating that those with damage to the frontal networks of the brain are more likely to have EF difficulties, is now quite large. But how do these difficulties impact on behaviour? 

How executive function difficulties affect behaviour

There are many different ways in which difficulties with executive function can affect our behaviour. For example, impairments in cognitive flexibility may lead to rigid thinking and difficulty adapting to rules. These difficulties may contribute to so called oppositional or non-compliant behaviour, emotional outbursts and lowered tolerance to frustration – especially when people are unable to read others’ emotional cues or respond appropriately to them.  

In one of the first studies to use behavioural assessment of aggression in response to provocation, Tonnaer and colleagues [8] found that the ability to inhibit responses, or put differently, the ability to ‘count to ten before responding’, was a key factor, as their study showed this to be a stronger predictor of reactive aggressive behaviour than other executive functions, such as working memory, flexibility, and divided attention.  

More recent studies have investigated the specific contribution of focal prefrontal cortex damage and executive dysfunction to our ability to recognise emotions. Ouerchefani and colleagues [9] examined 30 patients with focal prefrontal cortex damage and 30 controls. They asked both groups to complete inhibition, flexibility, planning, and emotion recognition tasks. The patients demonstrated impairments in recognising fear, sadness, and anger, alongside deficits on all executive measures. Poorer emotion recognition was associated with deficits in inhibition and cognitive flexibility, highlighting the interplay between executive dysfunction and emotional dysregulation. 

In a second study, the same research group [10] reported that over 50% of people with focal prefrontal damage presented both cognitive and behavioural dysexecutive syndromes, displaying difficulties with initiation, inhibition, as well as behavioural dysregulation. These deficits were associated with decreased autonomy in day-to-day activities and increased behavioural issues, such as hypo- or hyper-activity, distractibility, irritability and aggressiveness. This further demonstrates the role that the frontal networks of the brain are likely to play on integrating cognitive processing and behavioural control. 

Why is this important?

Understanding a bit more about the role of executive functions in the human brain can helps us to consider some additional, or alternative perspectives or explanations for some of the seemingly constant stream of ‘bad news’ we are exposed to in the media and our everyday lives. While executive functions certainly do not explain each and every behaviour or event, it is always useful to know more about the science behind some of our human behaviours. 

To recap, executive functions, which are primarily controlled by the frontal lobes and prefrontal cortex, are vital for effective cognitive, emotional, and behavioural regulation. Damage to these areas can result in significant impairments, which in turn may lead to emotional dysregulation, difficulties in social functioning, behaviours that challenge, and, in some situations, even contribute to violence, criminal offences.  

Understanding this relationship has critical implications for education, prevention, and practice by health and social care professionals as well as that of those working within the criminal justice system, such as police, prison and probation officers. Without this understanding, it is difficult to effectively support people with such impairments and work with them to reduce behaviours of concern. The evidence we have to date, highlights how some behaviours often reflect neurological deficits, including the cognitive and emotional regulatory aspects of executive functions. However, there is more work to do to further explore how these changes in executive function after a brain injury evolve over time, and how different people respond to different intervention strategies.  

 

References 
  1. Cristofori, I., Cohen-Zimerman, S., & Grafman, J. (2019). Executive functions. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 163(3), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804281-6.00011-2 
  2. Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sassa, Y., Hashizume, H., Sekiguchi, A., Fukushima, A., & Kawashima, R. (2012). Brain structures associated with executive functions during everyday events in a non-clinical sample. Brain Structure and Function, 218(4), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0444-z 
  3. Norman, E. M., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Starkey, N. J. (2022). Executive function in individuals who are compliant and non-compliant with the conditions of a community-based sentence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 30(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.2003268 
  4. Epstein, D. J., Legarreta, M., Bueler, E., King, J., McGlade, E., & YurgelunTodd, D. (2016). Orbitofrontal cortical thinning and aggression in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Brain and Behavior, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.581 
  5. Basso, D., Bosio, I., Tarantino, V., & Carabba, F. (2025). Frontal regions and executive function testing: a doubted association shown by brain-injured patients. NeuroSci, 6(4), 105. 
  6. Harlow, J. M. (1999). Passage of an iron rod through the head. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 11(2), 281-283. 
  7. Manjila, S., Singh, G., Alkhachroum, A. M., & Ramos-Estebanez, C. (2015). Understanding Edward Muybridge: historical review of behavioral alterations after a 19th-century head injury and their multifactorial influence on human life and culture. Neurosurgical Focus, 39(1), E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.FOCUS15121 
  8. Tonnaer, F., Cima, M., & Arntz, A. (2016). Executive (dys)functioning and impulsivity as possible vulnerability factors for aggression in forensic patients. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 204(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000485 
  9. Ouerchefani, R, Ouerchefani, N., Ben Rejeb, M. R., & Le Gall, D. (2023). Role of the prefrontal cortex and executive functions in basic emotions recognition: evidence from patients with focal damage to the prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2023.2211345 
  10. Ouerchefani, R., Ouerchefani, N., Ben Rejeb, M. R., & Le Gall, D. (2024). Exploring behavioural and cognitive dysexecutive syndrome in patients with focal prefrontal cortex damage. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 31(4), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2036152 
Pattern used for background spacing